In all three of Dickinson’s poems, I
found that she uses really unusual capitalization and italicization, and yet methodical structure in her
poems. For one, I am just as intrigued about the words that she capitalizes or
italicizes. For example, in 1172, she uses personification in capitalizing “Cloud,”
but “Backs” is also capitalized. I did not understand the context of using “backs”
as a proper noun. Another example is when she capitalizes Tombs in the same
poem but unlike the other proper nouns in the poem, the line is written
passively. The italicization is seen in 237, where it almost seems as if random
words are italicized for emphasis. I wondered why there was so much variety in
what she did italicize and what she did not: some are nouns, some are
expressions, and others are verbs, it goes on. I wonder what the purpose of her
italicizing the words that she does is in her writing.
Contrary to the personification and
emphasis that was discussed above, Dickinson’s poems have significantly more
structure than the Whitman poem that we analyzed on Tuesday. There is a natural
cadence to her writing that I did not find in reading Whitman by myself. All
the stanzas have four lines, and there is a clear pattern and repetition in the
rhythm of the poems. There is even a rhyming scheme (ABCB) for many of the
stanzas. I wish I knew why she was so organized in her structure and yet so seemingly
sporadic with capitalization and italicization in her poems.
No comments:
Post a Comment