There
are several instances throughout the book in which religious undertones are
evident. Some instances of these
undertones are more apparent than others in the novel, and there are a number
of reasons for this. One of
Catherine Maria Sedgwick’s main objectives in writing the novel is to portray
the life of early colonists in the New World. Naturally, as part of the background for describing these
circumstances, it becomes necessary for Sedgwick to elaborate on the Puritan
ideology, as well as their basic reasons for breaking from the Church of
England to begin with. As opposed to other novels regarding the same time
period, Sedgwick’s sympathetic approach to describing the lifestyle and
interactions of the Pequot people, leads to a more critical portrayal of the
Puritan ideals and principles.
While religious undertones are rooted
even in the background context of the novel, more specific instances of this
are found within the plot itself, specifically in the contrast between Hope
Leslie and Esther Downing. Esther is clearly portrayed as the model Puritan
woman, exemplifying the religion’s standards and values. Hope’s character is
depicted in a more secular fashion, which is perhaps the reason she is
considered the less appropriate woman for Everell to marry. One somewhat ironic
moment in the reading occurred when the sailors believe that Hope is resemblant
of the Virgin Mary, of whom, next to Christ himself, many would consider one of
the chief figureheads of Christianity.
I find it interesting that Hope was confused for the Virgin Mary as
opposed to a more religious character such as Esther, something I believe
Sedgwick specifically intended for in the novel.
I agree with you in that there are some substantial parallels between the colonists and the Native Americans. However, I think it is important to also note the differences. I think there is a significant contrast between Mononotto and Mr. Winthrop and their ideas of justice. As we mentioned in class, Mr. Winthrop is calm and merciful, and Mononotto leads the same way at the beginning of the book. The irony of this is that their peoples are at war with each other, and yet their leaders are willing to negotiate with each other, at least at first.
ReplyDelete